Pralhad Joshi, Union Minister and BJP leader, has targeted the ruling Congress in Rajasthan and questioned whether people should vote for a party whose leader’s son has equated Sanatan Dharma with a disease.
Joshi was referring to the recent statement by Priyank Kharge, son of Congress national president Mallikarjun Kharge, in which he compared Sanatan Dharma to a disease that needs to be cured.
Joshi’s statement is seen as an attempt to polarize the electorate in Rajasthan ahead of the assembly elections due later this year. The BJP has been trying to woo Hindu voters in the state by projecting itself as the protector of Hinduism.
The Congress has condemned Joshi’s statement and accused him of trying to divide society. The party has also said that Kharge’s statement was taken out of context and that he was not equating Sanatan Dharma with a disease.
It remains to be seen whether Joshi’s statement will have any impact on the upcoming assembly elections in Rajasthan. However, it is clear that the BJP is trying to play the Hindu card in the state in order to gain an advantage over the Congress.
Should people vote for a party whose leader’s son has equated Sanatan Dharma with a disease?
This is a question that each individual voter must answer for themselves. There is no right or wrong answer. Some people may feel that it is important to vote for a party that shares their religious beliefs, while others may feel that religion is not a factor in their decision-making process.
It is important to remember that there are many other factors to consider when deciding which party to vote for, such as the party’s policies, platform, and candidates. Voters should also consider their own personal priorities when making their decision.
Ultimately, the decision of whether or not to vote for a party whose leader’s son has equated Sanatan Dharma with a disease is a personal one. There is no right or wrong answer, and each voter must make the decision that they feel is best for themselves and their country.